The Journal of Plastination

Published in J. Int. Soc. Plast. 1(1): 23-29 (1987)

Complete Examination of Mastectomy Specimens Using Sheet Plastination with Epoxy Resin

AUTHORS:
Andreas Guhr1 , Axel Mueller1 , Hans-Werner Anton1 , Gunther von Hagens2 , and Harmon Bickley 3
affiliations:

1- Frauen Klinik The University of Heidelberg Heidelberg, Bundesrepublik Deutschland
2- Anatomisches Institut The University of Heidelberg Heidelberg, Bundesrepublik Deutschland
3- Department of Pathology Mercer University School of Medicine Macon, Georgia 31207 USA

ABSTRACT:

A method is described for the complete macroscopic and microscopic examination of mastectomy specimens. The entire specimen is cut into 2.5 mm slices, stained and plastinated with clear epoxy. This renders each slice so transparent that it can be examined both grossly and at a magnification of 100X or greater. Thinner sections (4-10 microns) may be cut from a plastinated slice if an area requires even closer inspection. The entire process, including macroscopic and microscopic screening takes approximately seven days. Thus, the method is quite practical for use as a diagnostic regimen.

KEY WORDS:

Sheet Plastination; Epoxy; E12; Biodur

*CORRESPONDENCE TO:

Andreas Guhr Frauen Klinik The University of Heidelberg Heidelberg, Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Article Statistics

Volume: 1
Issue: 1
Allocation-id: 0000

Submitted Date:February 25, 1987
Accepted Date: March 25, 1987
Published Date: April 30, 1987

DOI Information:       https://doi.org/10.56507/NXYR1705

Loading



Copyright 2022 International Society for Plastination

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Article Citation

The Journal of Plastination (May 21, 2024) Complete Examination of Mastectomy Specimens Using Sheet Plastination with Epoxy Resin. Retrieved from https://journal.plastination.org/articles/complete-examination-of-mastectomy-specimens-using-sheet-plastination-with-epoxy-resin/.
"Complete Examination of Mastectomy Specimens Using Sheet Plastination with Epoxy Resin." The Journal of Plastination - May 21, 2024, https://journal.plastination.org/articles/complete-examination-of-mastectomy-specimens-using-sheet-plastination-with-epoxy-resin/
The Journal of Plastination - Complete Examination of Mastectomy Specimens Using Sheet Plastination with Epoxy Resin. [Internet]. [Accessed May 21, 2024]. Available from: https://journal.plastination.org/articles/complete-examination-of-mastectomy-specimens-using-sheet-plastination-with-epoxy-resin/
"Complete Examination of Mastectomy Specimens Using Sheet Plastination with Epoxy Resin." The Journal of Plastination [Online]. Available: https://journal.plastination.org/articles/complete-examination-of-mastectomy-specimens-using-sheet-plastination-with-epoxy-resin/. [Accessed: May 21, 2024]

INTRODUCTION

In Europe, the malignancy exhibiting highest incidence in the female is breast cancer. When one lesion is found, chances are between 13.4 and 41.6 percent that another growth exists in the same organ (1) (2) . Because of this high rate of multicentric occurrence, it is desirable to have a method that permits examination of each mastectomy specimen in its entirety.

Total-specimen examination has become even more important in recent years, given the emphasis now being placed on conservative surgical treatment such as subcutaneous mastectomy and quadrant-part resection. Specimens obtained from procedures such as these require complete histologic examination so that surgeon and patient alike may be assured of complete tumor resection.

Plastination, a method of impregnating tissue with curable polymer, was developed by one of the authors (GvH) and is now widely used for the preparation of teaching specimens (3) (4) (5). A variation of this technique (sheet plastination with clear epoxy) is ideally suited to the preparation of mastectomy specimens (total, subcutaneous or quadrant-part) for comprehensive macroscopic and microscopic inspection. In fact, it is the only method presently available that permits complete histologic scrutiny of such large specimens on a routine basis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The first five steps in the process lead to a sliced specimen completely impregnated with uncured clear epoxy. We will list these in sequence and discuss surface preparation and curing as a separate section.

1. Fixation:

The intact specimen is placed in 5% buffered formalin for one or two days until fixed hard enough to be cut by a slicing machine.

2. Slicing:

The specimen is now cut into 2.5 mm slices using a commercial meat slicer (see Appendix A) . Each slice should be identified by writing the case and slice numbers on blotting paper which is then stapled to the tissue. Slices may be radiographed at this stage if a comparative image is desired. We recommend a Faxitron table machine, using 45 sec exposure at 20 KeV.

3. Staining:

The slices are placed in a hemalum staining bath (Appendix B) until they acquire enough color for macroscopic viewing. This usually takes two or three minutes when the bath consists of one part hemalum and three parts distilled water. If the stain is diluted further with distilled water, the slices may remain in the bath up to several hours.

4. Dehydration:

The stained tissue is now dehydrated by progressive exposure to increasing concentrations of ethanol. We use 30%,50%,70%,90% and two or three changes of 100%. It is then immersed in a sequence of three baths of 100% acetone and one of 100% methylene chloride. The slices must remain in each bath for a minimum of two hours. This step accomplishes not only dehydration, but also degreasing and saturation with a volatile intermediary solvent (methylene chloride) that will propel the impregnation occurring in the next step.

5. Impregnation:

Tissue slices are now placed in a reaction mixture of the epoxy polymer (Appendix C) contained in a vacuum chamber. Pressure within this chamber is reduced at a very gradual rate, permitting the methylene chloride to vaporize at a gentle boil (indicated by slow bubbling at the surface). It should take about four hours to reach full vacuum, after which the tissue is allowed to remain for 12 additional hours at this low pressure. Air is then readmitted to the chamber over a one-hour period. The slices are now completely impregnated with uncured epoxy.

SURFACE PREPARATION AND CURING

Dehydration of the tissue slices causes some shrinkage and results in a distorted surface. For proper visual inspection, the surface of each slice must now be rendered smooth.

1. Compression: On a large glass plate (45x45 cm) lay a piece of thick plastic foil the same size. This foil must be heavier than ordinary mylar wrap so that it will not tear on removal. On top of this foil spread a layer of the polymer reaction mixture used in Step 5 (above). Now press the tissue slices firmly into the polymer, so as to remove trapped air bubbles. Pour more of the polymer over the tissue and cover them with a second sheet of plastic foil, similarly coated with a layer of polymer. Again, make sure that no air bubbles are trapped between the tissue and this second foil. A second glass plate is now placed on top of the second sheet of foil and the entire assembly is pressed together with strong clamps.

2. Draining: While still clamped, this multilayered "sandwich" is now placed over a pan to permit draining of excess polymer. Care must be taken to drain only the excess, not material impregnating the slices. We have achieved good results by placing the sandwich at a slight angle (about 10 degrees). At this angle we find that the impregnating resin remains in the tissue and only the excess is removed. Using a greater angle causes polymer to drain out of the tissue, resulting in surface irregularity around the surgical margins. Draining should be continued for about 2 days.

3. Curing: The fully drained sandwich, still firmly clamped, is now placed in an oven, previously heated to 50°C. After 24 to 48 hours at this temperature the epoxy will be fully cured. The sandwich may now be opened and the tissue slices removed.

RESULTS

Without magnification it usually possible to clearly distinguish skin, fat, gland, connective tissue blood vessels, tumor, cysts and lymph nodes. Thus, a preliminary screening can be accomplished using only the naked eye.
Magnification (up to 100X) permits detailed inspection in three dimensions by simply picking a field and adjusting the microscope through a sequence of focal planes. In this manner, a ductal carcinoma can be followed, in continuity, over several slices, from its origin at a terminal duct to its surface manifestation at the nipple.
Hemalum stains only the nucleus of the cell, hence only nuclei can be observed. This permits preliminary evaluation of at least two important diagnostic criteria of malignancy, nuclear pleomorphism and mitosis. If closer inspection is required, thinner sections may be cut from the questionable area of the slice and re-stained with hematoxylin and eosin for routine histopathological evaluation.

DISCUSSION

Until the development of plastination, two methods for screening breast slices had been reported: radiographic examination and saturation with wintergreen oil. The radiographic technique was described by Egan (6) and further refined by Lagios (7). Marcum (8) and Wellings (9,10) advocated immersion in wintergreen oil.

We have compared radiographic imaging with conventional pathologic examination for the screening of sliced subcutaneous mastectomy specimens (11) and have found that the former is three times more liable to detect residual cancer.

The plastination method herein described is judged to be even more sensitive than radiography, particularly when the specimen contains an abundance of dense fibrous connective tissue. Also, it must be considered that this method permits total, three-dimensional, visual inspection of the surgical margins of a specimen, in continuity. Insofar as we know, such versatility is unique to plastination.

Using the wintergreen oil technique, it is necessary to prepare 100 to 500 thin slices in polyethylene bags (9) . This is much more time-consuming than plastination (which requires only 10-15 slices) and limits the amount of magnification that can be employed. Also, this method involves serious problems regarding storage and the objectionable odor of the clearing medium.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The First Author would like to thank Professor Dr Harmon Bickley for an invitation and support to attend the Third International Conference on Plastination, April 21-25, 1986, San Antonio, Texas, at which this work was first reported. He is also grateful to the administrations of the Frauen Klinik and Pathologisches Institut of the University of Heidelberg for providing facilities. This paper could not have been written without the aid of his friend, Robert Ittig of San Francisco who volunteered a large amount of time to improve the clarity of the translation.

This work was supported by:

Tumorzentrum Heidelberg/Mannheim Im Neuenheimer Feld 110 D-6900 Heidelberg Bundesrepublik Deutschland

CONCLUSION

APPENDIX

A. SLICING MACHINE We use and recommend a Bizerba slicing machine. This instrument consistently leaves a smooth surface on each slice, a matter of importance for close inspection. The machine is available from: Bizerba, D-7460 Balingen, West Germany.

B. HEMALUM STAINING BATH (MAYER)
Hematoxylin (Merk #4305) --------------- 1 gram distilled water------------------------ 1 liter Sodium lodate (Merk #6525) ------------- 0.2 gram Potassium aluminum sulfate (Merk #1047) — 50 grams (after 24 hours) Chloral hydrate (Merk #2425)------------ 50 grams
Citric acid (Merk #242) ---------------- 1 gram

C. POLYMER REACTION MIXTURE* Biodur E12 Epoxy Resin — Biodur El Hardener -----
1 kilogram 300 grams

* Biodur products obtainable from:
Biodur Jahnstrasse 8 D-6900 Heidelberg West Germany

REFERENCES

1. Fischer, ER ; Gregorio, R ; Redmond, C ; Vellios, F ; Sommers, SC ; Fisher, B Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (Protocol No. 4): I: Observation concerning the multicentricity of mammary cancer Cancer 25:247, 1975
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197501)35:1<247::AID-CNCR2820350130>3.0.CO;2-S

2. Westmann-Naeser, S ; Bengtsson, E ; Erikson, 0 ; Jarkrans, T ; Nordin, B ; Stenkvist, B Multifocal breast carcinoma Am J Surg 142:255, 1981
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(81)90288-9

3. von Hagens, G Impregnation of soft biological specimens with thermosetting resins and elastomers Anat Rec 194:247, 1979
https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091940206

4. Bickley, HC ; von Hagens, G ; Townsend, FM An improved method for the preservation of teaching specimens Arch Pathol Lab Med 105:674, 1981

5. von Hagens, G Heidelberg Plastination Folder (published locally) Anatomisches Institut, Universitaet Heidelberg D-6900 Heidelberg, Bundesrepublik Deutschland

6. Egan, RL ; Ellis, TJ ; Powell, RW A team approach to the study of diseases of the breast Cancer 23:847, 1969
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(196904)23:4<847::AID-CNCR2820230419>3.0.CO;2-E

7. Lagios, MD Multicentricity of breast carcinoma demonstrated by routine correlated serial subgross and radiographic examination Cancer 40:1726, 1977
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197710)40:4<1726::AID-CNCR2820400449>3.0.CO;2-O

8. Marcum, RG ; Wellings, SR Subcutaneous pathology of the human breast: method and initial observations J Nat Cancer Inst 42:115, 1969

9. Wellings, SR ; Jensen, HM On the origin and progression of ductal carcinoma of the breast J Nat Cancer Inst 50:1111, 1973
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/50.5.1111

10. Wellings, SR ; Jensen,HM ; Markum, RG An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions J Nat Cancer Inst 55:231, 1975

Online ISSN: 2311-777X
Contact Us
Copyright 2022
bookmarkcrosslist