The Journal of Plastination

Published in J. Int. Soc. Plast 19:22-25 (2004)

High Temperature E12 Plastination to Produce Ultra-thin Sheets

AUTHORS:
M.C. SORA , B. STROBL , J. RADU
affiliations:

Center for  Anatomy  and Cell Biology, Medical  University a/ Vienna, Wiihringerstr. 1313, A-1090  Wien, Austria, Europe.

ABSTRACT:

The E12 method of plastination classically is used to create thin 3 - 5 mm transparent slices. If thinner slices, 0.5 - 1.0 mm are desired, it is necessary to use an ultra-thin slice plastination method. By using this method, the specimen is first plastinated as a block and then cut into the thinner slices The impregnation temperature and the percent accelerator (E600) are the key  elements necessary to obtain proper impregnation of the desired tissue block and contrary to all other plastination methods high temperature (30 to 60°C) is desired. The main goal of this paper is to describe the use of high temperature for processing ultra-thin (1 mm) epoxy plastinated slices. Only by using high temperature is the polymer thin enough to penetrate into the middle of a large processed  specimen.

KEY WORDS:

plastination; epoxy; E12; E6; impregnation; temperature; ultra-thin; slices

 

*CORRESPONDENCE TO:

M. C. Sora: Telephone:  43   1 4277  611  50;  Fax:  43   1  4277  611  70;
E-mail :  mircea-constantin.sora@meduniwien.ac.at

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Article Statistics

Volume: 19
Issue: Fall
Allocation-id: 0000

Submitted Date:June 24, 2004
Accepted Date: August 21, 2004
Published Date: December 31, 2004

DOI Information:       https://doi.org/10.56507/NOQQ3899

Loading



Copyright 2022 International Society for Plastination

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Article Citation

The Journal of Plastination (February 24, 2024) High Temperature E12 Plastination to Produce Ultra-thin Sheets. Retrieved from https://journal.plastination.org/articles/high-temperature-e12-plastination-to-produce-ultra-thin-sheets/.
"High Temperature E12 Plastination to Produce Ultra-thin Sheets." The Journal of Plastination - February 24, 2024, https://journal.plastination.org/articles/high-temperature-e12-plastination-to-produce-ultra-thin-sheets/
The Journal of Plastination - High Temperature E12 Plastination to Produce Ultra-thin Sheets. [Internet]. [Accessed February 24, 2024]. Available from: https://journal.plastination.org/articles/high-temperature-e12-plastination-to-produce-ultra-thin-sheets/
"High Temperature E12 Plastination to Produce Ultra-thin Sheets." The Journal of Plastination [Online]. Available: https://journal.plastination.org/articles/high-temperature-e12-plastination-to-produce-ultra-thin-sheets/. [Accessed: February 24, 2024]

INTRODUCTION

One of the critical factors of plastination  is temperature . Usually, during dehydration, degreasing or E12 impregnation of slices, the temperature does not exceed room temperature  values.  High temperature, up to 45°C is only used during curing. The question  is: "Why high temperature is not used?" High temperatures are not used during dehydration and degreasing because high temperature increases shrinkage and during impregnation  the  E12/E1  impregnation  mixture becomes very viscous within  hours,  preventing complete impregnation. The exception is E12/E1 block impregnation with curing using E6 hardener which utilizes high temperature (60°C).

The usual steps in E12  plastination   are  preparing thin slices (3-5mm) of the desired specimen, cold dehydration,  degreasing,  impregnation  and  finally curing (von Hagens,  1985; Weber and Henry, 1993; Cook, 1996; Cook, 1997; Fasel, 1988; Ann, 1999; Lane, 2000; Sora, 2002; Sora, 2004). However, ultra-thin slice plastination produces slices with a thickness of 1 mm or less after impregnation (Fritsch, 1991; Seibold, 1991; Sittel, 1996;  Johnson,  2000;  Windisch,  2001). Therefore, after the specimen has been dehydrated, it is impregnated, cured and finally sawed to obtain the ultra-thin E12 slices. The main goal of this paper is to present the utility of high temperature in processing and creating cured E12 blocks  for  sawing  ultra-thin plastinated slices. One of the greatest problems during plastination of bigger tissue blocks is to get the E12 polymer into the middle of the block. At room temperature, the E12 polymer is a liquid but gets thicker when the temperature is decreased. If temperature  is increased, the E12 polymer gets thin, almost like water. However, once theE12/E1 reaction mixture is prepared , increased temperature hastens the reaction of the E1 hardener with the E12 and after  a  short  time  the polymer mixture becomes too viscous to impregnate tissue.  Therefore,  a  different  hardener,  E6,  is  used  in making E12 blocks. The Biodur E6 hardener is an anhydride-based hardener of low viscosity (von Hagens, 1985) which permits impregnation of the specimen at 30°C to 60°C with no immediate thickening of the polymer reaction  mixture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Material, dehydration and  degreasing:

One male unfixed human cadaver ankle was used for this study. The foot and the distal third of the tibia were removed . The foot was positioned in 90° dorsal flexion and frozen at -80°C for one week. Next, a tissue block containing the ankle was produced for plastination by removal of the tissue 4cm distal to and 5cm proximal to the tip of the lateral malleolus. The ankle block was placed into a -25°C freezer for two days and then submerged in 25 liters of cold (-25°C) technical quality 100% acetone for dehydration . This dehydration  bath was changed after 4 weeks and had been diluted to a concentration of 92%. The second dehydration bath was for 3 weeks and the final concentration was 97%. The third and final dehydration bath was for two weeks and had a final reading of 99%. When dehydration was finished, the freezer was disconnected allowing the temperature to increase to room  temperature  (15°C). The warmed acetone was changed for room temperature methylene-chloride (MeCl) for degreasing. Degreasing was complete when the adipose  tissue  became transparent after 4 weeks.

Impregnation :

The dehydrated/degreased specimen was removed from the methylene chloride bath and submerged in El2 impregnation mixture [E12(polymer)/E6(hardener)/ E600(accelerator) (100/50/0.2)] (von Hagens, 1985) in a Heraeus VT 6130 M vacuum drying oven (Haraeus Instruments, Kendra Laboratory Products GmbH) at 30°C. No vacuum was applied until the next morning in order to allow equilibration and penetration of the El2 mixture. To commence impregnation, the next day vacuum was applied and stabilized at 40cm Hg pressure at +30°C. From this point, pressure was continuously reduced, 8cm Hg daily, over five days until 2 mm Hg was reached. Temperature was kept at 30°C the first four days and on the last day the temperature was increased to 60°C .

Casting and curing:

After impregnation, the specimen (Fig.  1) was removed from the vacuum oven and placed in a mold built of Styrofoam and lined with polyethylene foil (Fig. 2). The mold was filled with the polymer reaction­ mixture [E12/E6/E600 (100/ 50/ 0.2)].  The filled mold, containing the impregnated  specimen, was placed in an oven at 65°C for 4 days to harden the  polymer.  The block was cooled to room temperature and the mold removed (Fig. 3).

Slicing:

Using a contact point diamond blade saw, Exact 310 CP (Exact Apparatebau GmbH, Norderstedt, Germany), the hardened E12 block was cut into 1 mm slices (Fig. 4). Tissue, the width of the saw blade (0.4mm), between the slices was lost.

Figure 1. Impregnated E12 ankle specimen

Figure 2. Building up an adequate mold for the specimen.

Figure 3. Cured E12 block.

Figure 4. Cross section at the level of the tibia-fibular joint.

RESULTS

An E12 block was produced that was hard and transparent. Ultra-thin , <l mm slices produced from this block were transparent and hard with good optical qualities. The finished E12 slices provided excellent anatomic detail down to the microscopic level.

DISCUSSION

Impregnation is one of the main steps in plastination . The main goal is to impregnate the specimen thoroughly . This requires that the resin/hardener­ mixture be thin enough to penetrate the specimen and also have a processing time of sufficient length to penetrate the depths of the specimen. The viscosity of epoxy resin varies markedly with temperature . At low temperature the viscosity of the resin is high, while high temperature yields a resin of low viscosity. During impregnation at low temperatures, 5°C or less, epoxy becomes viscous. However, low temperature prolongs the processing time. This prolonged processing time with the standard E12 method (E12 polymer mixed with El hardener) is the reason that impregnation is preferably performed at 5°C for 2 days. But by using this method, only slices of an average thickness of 3- 5mm can be impregnated because of the rapidly increasing viscosity of the reaction-mixture.

The epoxy technique described in this work produces slices by sawing 1 mm (ultra-thin) plastinated plates from an El2 specimen block. Therefore, a large tissue block, with a thickness of lOcm, is impregnated rather than thin, 3-5mm slices. In order to impregnate such a tissue block, the reaction-mixture must have a low viscosity and the impregnation time must be prolonged . This is achieved by using the E6 hardener and by increasing the temperature during impregnation. The processing time of the El2/E6 reaction-mixture depends on the quantity of accelerator E600 and  on the temperature . High temperature and increased quantity of E600 both lead to faster polymerization and a decrease in the processing time. Before starting impregnation , the dehydrated and degreased tissue block is submerged in the reaction-mixture for at least 8 hours, to allow the E12/E6/E600 mixture to equilibrate and begin penetration into the tissue block. As well, some volatile intermedium (methylene  chloride) escapes from the specimen and lowers the viscosity of the reaction-mixture. The viscosity of the E6 hardener is high, and for this reason the E12/E6/E600 mixture is quite viscous at room temperature. Therefore, impregnation is started at 30°C. At this temperature , the reaction-mixture viscosity remains low for the next few days, since viscosity decreases with increase of temperature.

The first four days, impregnation is performed at 30°C and on the fifth (last) day the temperature is increased to 60°C to aid extraction  of the remaining volatile intermedium from the specimen and to aid influx of the polymer reaction-mixture. Since increasing the temperature thins the E 12/E6/E600 reaction - mixture, extraction of MeCl from the impregnation bath is  easier.  As  well, the  lower  viscosity  impregnation mixture penetrates the tissue block easier.

This kind of temperature/vacuum regulation is performed easily in a vacuum drying oven, where simultaneous adjustment of vacuum and regulation of temperature can be performed. The use of 60°C on the last day must be monitored carefully. At this temperature, the E 12/E6/E600 mixture at first becomes thinner ; but after several hours the polymer-mixture becomes thicker and bubbles rise slower and splash intensely marking the onset of polymerization.

Polymerization of E12 is dependent on the chosen hardener , temperature and percent of accelerator. For the impregnation of large tissue blocks, the E6 hardener was used which provides a longer impregnation time. Hence, by varying the amount of accelerator used , the length   of   time   available  for  impregnation   can  be significantly altered. Using 0.2% of accelerator E600 in the E12/E6 mixture was sufficient to assure proper impregnation and curing of the block. By omitting the E600 from the E12/E6 mixture, polymerization of the block will not occur, even if temperatures of 60°C are maintained for several months (von Hagens, 1985). The plastination folder is the only source which lists, in a table, the reaction time and hardening of E12/E6/E600 mixtures. All suggested percentages of E600 have been tested and are correct. The end product, using this protocol , was an El2 block that was firm and transparent. Such blocks are necessary to cut ultra-thin slices (<l mm).

Ultra-thin slices <l mm are essential if the histology is to be studied on plastinated slices or if 3D reconstruction is desired (Sha, 2001; Qiuet, 2003). These ultra-thin slices can only be cut from a solid E 12 block. Therefore, knowledge of controlling temperature and percent of accelerator in the ultra-thin sheet plastination method is essential.  Histological examination can be performed up to a magnification of 40X. Greater magnification is not possible due to the thickness (>300 microns) of the specimen (Sora, 2002). Slides can be stained by the usual methods for histological specimens (Gruber, 2001). The major advantage of this method is that the structures remain intact and the decalcifying of bony tissue is not necessary. Plastination allows the topography of structures to be studied in a non-collapsed and non­ dislocated  state.  Therefore,  morphological measurements can be performed easily and accurately.

REFERENCES

An P-C, Zhang M. 1999: A technique for preserving the subarachnoid space and its contents in a natural state with different colours. J Int Soc Plastination 14(1):12-17.
https://doi.org/10.56507/CQUW3856

Cook P. 1996: Plastination as a clinically based teaching aid at the University of Auckland. J Int Soc Plastination 11(1):22.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000147907

Cook P, Al-Ali S. 1997: Submacroscopic interpretation of human sectional anatomy using plastinated El2 sections. J Int Soc Plastination 12(2): 17-27.
https://doi.org/10.56507/XICY2283

Fasel J, Mohler R, Lehmann B. 1988: A technical note for improvement of the El2 technique. J Int Soc Plastination 2(1):4-7.
https://doi.org/10.56507/LNBR6798

Fritsch H, Hegemann L. 1991: Simplification of the production of plastination histologic preparations through the use of a grinding machine. [in German with English abstract]. Anat Anz 173(3):161-165.

Gruber H, Brenner E, Schmitt 0, Fritsch H. 2001: The different growth zones of the fetal foot. Ann Anat 183(3):267-273.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0940-9602(01)80232-6

Johnson G, Zhang M, Barnett R. 2000: A Comparison between epoxy resin slices and histology sections in the study of spinal connective tissue structure. J Int Soc Plastination 15(1):10-13.
https://doi.org/10.56507/CXGV7781

Lane A 1990: Sectional anatomy: standardized methodology. J Int Soc Plastination 4(1): 16-22.
https://doi.org/10.56507/LYMW2924

Qiu MG, Zhang SX, Liu ZJ, Tan LW, Wang YS, Deng JH, Tang ZS. 2003 : Plastination and computerized 3D reconstruction of the temporal bone. Clin Anat 16(4):300-303.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10076

Sha Y, Zhang SX, Liu ZJ, Tan LW, Wu XY, Wan YS, Deng JH, Tang ZS. 2001: Computerized 3D­ reconstructions of the ligaments of the lateral aspect of ankle and subtalar joints . Surg Radio! Anat 23(2): 111-114.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-001-0111-1

Seibold R, Eitel F, Waldner H, Brunner U, von Hagens 1991: A new application of plastination in bone histology. [in German with English abstract]. UnfallChirurg 94(12):624-633.

Sittel C, Eckel HE, Sprinzl GM, Stennert E. 1996: Sheet-plastination of the human larynx for serial section histology . [in German with English abstract]. HNO 44(7):370-375 .

Sora MC, Brugger PC, Strobl B. 2002: Shrinkage during El2 plastination. J Int Soc Plastination 17:23- 27.
https://doi.org/10.56507/DIUH4490

Sora MC, Strobl B, Staykov D, Traxler H. 2002: Optic nerve compression analyzed by using plastination. Surg Radio! Anat 24(3-4):205-208 .
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-002-0037-2

Sora MC, Strobl B, Staykov D, Forster-Streffleur S. 2004: Evaluation of the ankle syndesmosis: A plastination slices study. Clin Anat 17(6):513-517 .
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20019

von Hagens G. 1985: Heidelberg plastination folder: Collection of technical leaflets for plastination. Anatomisches Institut 1, Universitiit Heidelberg , Heidelberg, p 9/1-14 .

Weber W, Henry RW. 1993: Sheet plastination of body slices - El2 technique, filling method. J Int Soc Plastination 7(1): 16-22.
https://doi.org/10.56507/EZGX2343

Windisch G, Weiglein AH. 2001 : Anatomy of synovial sheaths in the talocrural region evaluated by sheet plastination. J Int Soc Plastination 16:19-22
https://doi.org/10.56507/HVGY3362

Online ISSN: 2311-777X
Contact Us
Copyright 2022
bookmarkcrosslist