The Journal of Plastination

Published in J. Int. Soc. Plast. 23: 10-16 (2008)

Silicone Plastination Procedure for Producing Thin, Semi- transparent Tissue Slices: A Study Using the Pig Kidney

AUTHORS:
L. Pendovski , V. Petkov , F. Popovska-Percinic , V. Ilieski
affiliations:

University  Sts  Cyril  and  Methodius,  Faculty  of  Veterinary  Medicine.  Department  of  Functional Morphology, Lazar Pop Trajkov 5-7, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia, Europe

ABSTRACT:

Kidneys from five month-old mixed-breed pigs were collected and 2-3mm thick longitudinal slices were prepared  for viewing  sub-gross anatomy  as fresh  tissue or as  routinely plastinated tissue with and without degreasing. Standard cold silicone plastination procedures were used. Sliced fresh tissue and cured plastinated specimens were placed on a glass plate and back-lit to evaluate anatomical detail. All specimens yielded similar anatomical detail. However, degreased, plastinated specimens yielded the most anatomical detail. These thin  silicone  slices  produce  a durable permanent record similar to epoxy sections without the need for casting slices.

KEY WORDS:

plastination; silicone; porcine; kidney; tissue

*CORRESPONDENCE TO:
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Article Statistics

Volume: 23
Issue: 1
Allocation-id: 0000

Submitted Date:September 26, 2007
Accepted Date: May 14, 2008
Published Date: July 31, 2008

DOI Information:       https://doi.org/10.56507/JDQP3855

Loading



Copyright 2022 International Society for Plastination

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Article Citation

The Journal of Plastination (June 20, 2024) Silicone Plastination Procedure for Producing Thin, Semi- transparent Tissue Slices: A Study Using the Pig Kidney. Retrieved from https://journal.plastination.org/articles/silicone-plastination-procedure-for-producing-thin-semi-transparent-tissue-slices-a-study-using-the-pig-kidney/.
"Silicone Plastination Procedure for Producing Thin, Semi- transparent Tissue Slices: A Study Using the Pig Kidney." The Journal of Plastination - June 20, 2024, https://journal.plastination.org/articles/silicone-plastination-procedure-for-producing-thin-semi-transparent-tissue-slices-a-study-using-the-pig-kidney/
The Journal of Plastination - Silicone Plastination Procedure for Producing Thin, Semi- transparent Tissue Slices: A Study Using the Pig Kidney. [Internet]. [Accessed June 20, 2024]. Available from: https://journal.plastination.org/articles/silicone-plastination-procedure-for-producing-thin-semi-transparent-tissue-slices-a-study-using-the-pig-kidney/
"Silicone Plastination Procedure for Producing Thin, Semi- transparent Tissue Slices: A Study Using the Pig Kidney." The Journal of Plastination [Online]. Available: https://journal.plastination.org/articles/silicone-plastination-procedure-for-producing-thin-semi-transparent-tissue-slices-a-study-using-the-pig-kidney/. [Accessed: June 20, 2024]

INTRODUCTION

Plastination of tissue by polymer impregnation is a unique method for preserving specimens in a permanent way (von Hagens, 1986). Sheet plastination is an internationally accepted method  for  preservation  of tissue slices (Weber and Henry, 1993; Sora and Cook, 2007; Weber et al., 2007). It has been shown that sheet plastinated slices are excellent tools for demonstrating the anatomical topography of structures within specimens. The E12 and P35/40  techniques  have become the methods of choice for creating 2-5mm or even 8mm  semitransparent organ or body slices (Sora and Cook, 2007; Latorre and Henry, 2007). These techniques offer a unique opportunity for radiographic- anatomic-pathologic correlation and facilitation of understanding of complex anatomical relationships (Mc Niesh, 1988).

The S10 technique is best known for preservation of isolated organs or whole bodies (Henry, 1997; de Jong and Henry, 2007). This technique is also used for producing thick slices (0.5 – 1.0cm or more) which are utilized widely for education (von Hagens, 1987; Weiglein, 1997). S10 plastination of entire or halved kidneys is common (von Hagens, 1986; Oostrom, 1998; Ilieski, 2005; Pereira-Sampaio  et  al.,  2007).  However, no studies were found in which thin slices of kidneys were prepared and plastinated using  the  cold  silicone S10 process.

Therefore, in order to visualize sub-gross structures of the kidney for anatomical study and research, a protocol was developed which  could  use  the  S10 method for producing thin sheet plastinated kidney slices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 kidneys from five month-old pigs weighing 95kg (mean) were collected from two breeds at the abattoir for this study. Thirty kidneys were from mixed-breed Dalland pigs and 30 kidneys were from mixed-breed Landrace/Yorkshire pigs.  The  kidneys were removed from the pig carcasses together with the surrounding adipose tissue in order to preserve kidney shape and size. Upon arrival at the laboratory, the renal fat  and  capsule  were  removed  and  the  kidneys  were

flushed in cold tap water for three hours. The kidneys were then cooled in a refrigerator at +4oC for two hours to firm the tissue for slicing 2-3mm thick longitudinal sections.

Specimen preparation, dehydration and defatting

Tissue slices were cut on a deli slicer (Fig. 1) and divided into three groups: 1. For plastination after fixation and degreasing, 2. For

Figure 1. Preparing to cut fresh 2-3 mm longitudinal pig kidney slices on a meat slicer.

plastination  after fixation but without degreasing, and 3. For viewing as fresh tissue (no fixation or plastination).

Group 1. Each slice for plastination was numbered and placed on a wire mesh (Fig. 2). Another wire mesh was placed on top of the slice forming a sandwich of wire  mesh/specimen  slice/wire   mesh/specimen slice/wire mesh, etc. (Sora and Cook, 2007; Henry and Latorre, 2007). The stack of sandwiched slices was placed in a plastic box and the slices were rinsed with flowing cold tap water for one hour  to  remove remaining blood (Weiglein,  1997;  Sora  and  Cook, 2007). After flushing, the stacked  slices  were submerged in 3% formalin solution for five days for fixation (Oostrom, 1987). After fixation the sandwiched slices were transferred into  in  a  stainless  steel  basket and were rinsed with cold tap water overnight to flush out  the  formalin.  Before  dehydration,  the  slices  and water were pre-cooled in a refrigerator (+5oC) for five hours. Dehydration of specimens was carried out using the freeze substitution method in pure, cold (-25oC) acetone  with  a

Figure 2. Thin kidney slices, numbered and placed between wire mesh.

fluid:tissue  ratio  of  10:1  (Tiedemann, 1988). The basket with slices was removed from  the water bath and submerged in the  first  100%  acetone bath for five days. The slices were then transferred into the second acetone bath for another five days. After transfer of the slices into the third acetone bath for five days, acetone concentration was monitored  to  make sure that the final acetone percentage was at least 99% for three more days. Acetone purity was monitored with an acetonometer (de Jong and Henry, 2007). After complete dehydration of specimens, the  final  acetone bath was allowed to gradually warm to ambient (room) temperature for three days to hasten degreasing of the specimens.

Group 2. Slices were produced to compare the clarity of anatomical structures of plastinated pig kidney slices to that of plastinated slices which had not been degreased prior to impregnation. This protocol was the same as for the degreased slices, except they were impregnated when dehydration was complete and not brought out to degrease at ambient temperature. The slices   were   placed   directly   into   the   impregnation polymer   from   the   cold   acetone.   Impregnation   and curing were identical to the degreased plastinated slices.

Group 3. Slices  were produced  to observe and compare their anatomical structure as fresh tissue slices only and were not plastinated. Their initial preparatory steps were identical to those of slices to be plastinated. However, after the one hour flush to remove any remaining blood and before fixation, their anatomical features were examined using bright, back light illumination similar to viewing of the plastinated slices.

Impregnation and curing

Figure 3. Digital controller for precise pressure control.

Cold impregnation of kidney slices with the silicone reaction-mixture was carried out by continuous impregnation as established by Dr. von Hagens (1986). The dehydrated slices were immersed  in a mixture of silicone   polymer   and   catalyst   [containing   a   chain extender (S10/S3)] at a ratio of 100:0.5 and allowed to sit and equilibrate in the -20°C polymer-mix for three days.

Thereafter, vacuum was applied and pressure was slowly decreased to ~8mmHg over 10 days. The rate of pressure decrease was monitored by observing bubble formation on the polymer surface and then setting the parameters daily for the digital vacuum controller (Fig. 3). The controller consists of a digital manometer and needle valve for pressure increase (open the valve) or pressure decrease (close the valve). The vacuum controller semi-automatically decreases pressure once it has been programmed for that incremental decrease. Prior to a decrease of pressure, the controller will allow an increase in pressure of 10mmHg. This increase in pressure allows tissues to relax and thus release the vaporized acetone which in turn allows better uptake of the S10/S3 mixture into the tissue and hence minimizes shrinkage. Then the controller automatically decreases pressure to the set level to

Figure 4. Initial draining of excess polymer after impregnation.

maintain bubble formation and acetone vaporization. The pressure parameters are set daily in conjunction with observation of bubble production.

Impregnation was judged  complete when bubble production   ceased   and   pressure   was   stabilized   at ~8mmHg. After impregnation, the vacuum chamber and its  contents  were  removed  from  the  deep  freezer  and placed  at  room  temperature.  The  pressure  was  slowly increased  to  atmospheric  pressure  over  a  three  day period (Henry and Nel, 1993; deJong and Henry, 2007).

The impregnated slices and grids were removed from  the  plastination  kettle  as  a  unit  and  the  excess coating of polymer was allowed to drain from the slices and screen (Fig. 4). After draining, the slices were placed on paper towels and covered with towels for 24 hours to continue the removal of excess surface silicone (Fig. 5).

Curing was carried out in a gas curing chamber in which the specimens were exposed to

Figure 5. Final draining of impregnated slices.

S6 vapors for five days at room temperature (Fig. 6). An aliquot of CaCl2 was placed in the chamber to control moisture. A small membrane pump was used to bubble air through the S6 to enhance vaporization of the liquid gas cure and hence accelerate curing of the kidney slices (Weiglein and Henry, 1993; de Jong and Henry, 2007). After five days exposure to S6, curing of the kidney  slices  was complete.

Slice evaluation

Each slice was placed on a clear glass plate, at the intended  time,  and  examined  and  photographed  using the  background  light  (epidiascope)  to  illuminate  the kidney from beneath.

Figure 6. Gas curing of impregnated kidney slices.

A steps and timetable summary for the S10- technique for thin kidney slices is as follows:

SLICE: cold, non-fixed kidneys FLUSH; 1 hour cold tap water
FIX: 5 days room temperature formalin (3%) FLUSH: overnight cold tap water
COOL: 5 hour at +5°C DEHYDRATE: 15 days at -25°C
DEGREASE: 3 days at room temperature POLYMER IMMERSION: 3 days at -20°C FORCED IMPREGNATION: 10 days at -20°C
POST-IMPREGNATION: 3 days at room temperature GAS-CURING: 5 days at room temperature

 

RESULTS

Thin slices of the kidney were produced using a modified S10 plastination protocol along  with  and without degreasing. The degreased plastinated slices were of good quality and semitransparent. Plastinated slices yielded clarity of sub-gross anatomy. They were thin and semitransparent and fine detail of many anatomical structures could be observed. The  slices were flexible, dry, and odorless with smooth surfaces, were easy to handle and  to  evaluate.  They  were prepared with relative ease and limited expense and are suitable for storage at room temperature. Neither noticeable shrinkage nor  distortions  were  observed  in the slices.

Figure 7. Detail of degreased, plastinated pig kidney slice. Renal papillae surrounded by renal calicies (arrows).

Figure 8. Anatomical detail of degreased, plastinated pig kidney slice. Interlobar arteries(*).

Figure 9. Anatomical detail of degreased, plastinated pig kidney slice. Segmental arteries (arrows) in renal sinus.

Anatomic detail down to the wall and lumen of interlobar arteries (a. interlobaris) was clearly delineated from the surrounding

Figure 10. Anatomical detail of degreased, plastinated pig kidney slice. Arcuate artery (white arrow), interlobular arteries (black, double headed arrow), perimeter of calyx (black arrows), renal papillae (*).

kidney tissue (Figs. 7, 8, 9) as were the arcuate arteries (a. arcuate) (Fig. 10). Similarly, most sub-gross anatomy of  the  plastinated S10 pig kidney slices was easily recognized. Distinction between renal cortical structures and renal medullary structures was evident (Figs. 7, 9). The renal cortex was light colored and the renal medulla, represented by pyramids, was dark in color. The renal pyramids were triangular in form with discrete radial  structures  and their base was directed toward  the  outer  cortical surfaces of the kidney (Fig. 7). The conical renal papilla of a pyramid was surrounded by a renal calyx that was cup shaped (Fig. 7).

Fresh tissue slices had wet surfaces and their anatomical subdivisions were loose and difficult to handle and evaluate. Hand manipulation of these specimens was difficult since the  component relationships were easily distorted or disrupted. With background  lighting, the  medullary  structures  were reddish   colored   with   no   clear   demarcation   from surrounding lighter colored cortical tissue (Fig. 11).

The dehydrated but not degreased slices showed distinction between the renal structures. However, finer details such as the lumen of some segmental arteries within the parenchyma were not clearly delineated. These slices were less transparent with less delineation between the blood vessels inside the kidney parenchyma primarily due to the presence of fat (Fig. 12).

The dehydrated and degreased slices showed clear distinctions between the renal structures down  to  the finer detail of sub-gross    structures (Fig. 13)

 

Figure 11. Fresh pig kidney slice.

Figure 14. Anatomical detail of degreased, plastinated pig kidney slice.

Figure 12. Dehydrated pig kidney slice.

Figure 13. Dehydrated and degreased pig kidney slice.

 

DISCUSSION

Our goal of producing thin slices of the kidney using a modified S10 plastination protocol which would aid anatomical study was successful. Clarity of sub-gross anatomy was similar to specimens produced by the E12 or P35/40 methods. This is primarily due to the thinness of slices and resultant transparency which yielded anatomical detail of many structures.

To date, epoxy and polyester plastinated slices have no flexibility  and are brittle and often  fracture if dropped. Classically,  silicone  plastinated  specimens have a degree of flexibility. To provide maximal flexibility of kidney slices, only one half of the S3 catalyst was used to make the reaction-mixture. This along with slice thinness assured that the silicone slices had good flexibility.

As was expected, shrinkage was minimized by cold dehydration. Allowing the slices to equilibrate both when loaded into the reaction-mixture and upon conclusion of impregnation before decreasing  or increasing pressure respectively is also known to minimize tissue shrinkage. In addition, the planned incremental decreases of pressure by the vacuum controller, allow uniform decreases of pressure until pressure is reduced to 8mmHg. This uniform decrease of pressure along with alternate timed 10mmHg increases in pressure allows tissues to relax and thus release the vaporized acetone which in turn allows better intake of the S10/S3 mixture into the tissue and hence minimizes shrinkage.

Cook (1997) reported that E12 plastinated kidney sections when viewed in situ body slices yielded an informative profile of the capsule, cortex, medulla and pyramids. Similarly, the sub-gross anatomy of the plastinated S10 pig kidney slices was easily recognized and apparently observed in yet more detail.

One of the main features of E12 or  P35/40 specimens is the transparency of the specimen slice (Steinke, 2002; Sora and Cook, 2007; Weber et  al., 2007: Henry and Latorre, 2007). Bringing the last acetone bath to room temperature for a few days produced a satisfactory degree of transparency in S10 slices by reducing the fat accumulation in the  renal sinus. Likely more transparency of the renal sinus could be obtained by a few more days of room temperature acetone defeating. However, the dehydrated but not degreased slices and the fresh slices both showed less transparency and hence less distinction between renal structures. Medullary structures were dark colored and could be recognized from the surrounding cortical tissue yet segmental arteries in the parenchyma and their lumina were not clearly delineated from the surrounding kidney tissue due to the high lipid content of the renal sinus. This work demonstrates that thin S10 semitransparent kidney slices can contribute to future research activities. The aim of our next study will be to explore the segmental arterial structure in pig kidney.

Being able to visualize the sub-gross anatomy in situ on the thin S10 plastinated slices, should have a positive effect in undergraduate and postgraduate teaching. Students provided  with  sagittal sections  of the  kidney can visualize a complete overview of renal anatomy. Besides the great educational value that S10 thin specimens will have, these kidney slices for a research investigation. As well, the possibilities of three dimensional reconstruction of the thin  plastinated kidney will allow many opportunities for further investigation, one being counting of the number of renal pyramids per kidney in both breeds and to analyze the variations in the way they unite and way they open into the renal pelvis.

The degreased S10 plastinated pig kidney slices prove to be an excellent teaching and research tool in anatomy. The kidneys plastinated in thin slices by this technique are safe for student handling  and  use. Students can handle these slices and reconstruct the pig kidney. This will aid their understanding of the specific anatomical detail of the 2-3mm thick specimens; as well as help them bridge the gap between gross and histological structures.

Due to the possibility for analysis of the space relationship between the renal papilla inside the  renal calyx (Fig. 12), the thin plastinated slices will be used for future research activities in endourology  where  a three dimensional view may aid locating kidney stones inside the lumen of the calyx. We believe this will contribute to development of new or a modification of available techniques for stone disease treatment. The knowledge of anatomy based on thin plastinated kidney slices will also assure more accurate interpretation of diagnostic CT or MR scans.

We can conclude that the S10  technique  may  be used for producing 2-3mm organ slices. As well, sub- gross anatomy is distinct and these slices are a better aid from which to study and record the various aspects of anatomy in the kidney than fresh slices  or  non- degreased slices. The method that we applied is easy to follow and uses materials that are found  in  the  most basic plastination laboratory.

REFERENCES

Cook P, Al-Ali S. 1997: Submacroscopic interpretation of human sectional anatomy using plastinated E12 sections. J Int Soc Plastination 12(2):17-27.
https://doi.org/10.56507/XICY2283

De Jong K and Henry RW. 2007: Silicone plastination of Biological Tissue: Cold temperature Technique Biodur S10/S15 Technique and Products. J Int Soc Plastination 22:2-14.
https://doi.org/10.56507/ZLMJ7068

Henry RW, Nel PPC. 1993: Forced impregnation for the standard S10 method. J Int Soc Plastination 7(1): 27-31.
https://doi.org/10.56507/WUXP9436

Henry RW, Janick L, Henry C. 1997: Specimen preparation for silicone plastination. J Int Soc Plastination. 12(1): 13-17.
https://doi.org/10.56507/HVSK9838

Henry RW, Latorre R. 2007: Polyester Plastination of Biological Tissue: P40 technique for Brain Slices. J Int Soc Plastination 22:59-68.
https://doi.org/10.56507/VKCL2525

Ilieski V, Pendovski L, Ulcar I. 2005: Evaluation of Shrinkage on Pig Kidneys with S10 technique: Study before and After Plastination. Proceedings of the 8th Interim Conference for Plastination, 42-43.

Latorre R, Henry RW. 2007: Polyester Plastination of Biological Tissue: P40 technique for Body Slices. J Int Soc Plastination 22:69-77.
https://doi.org/10.56507/CARV3913

McNiesh LM, von Hagens G. 1998: The diagnostic imaging characteristics of plastinated anatomical specimens. J Int Soc Plastination 2(1):24-39.
https://doi.org/10.56507/RMEK8272

Oostrom K. 1987: Fixation of tissue for plastination: General Principles J Int Soc Plastination 1(1):3-11.
https://doi.org/10.56507/WLZH2223

Oostrom K. 1998: Plastination of the human kidney. J. Int. Soc. Plastination 2(2):21-24.
https://doi.org/10.56507/DCIG8245

Pereira-Sampaio MA, LA Favorito, Henry RW, FJB Sampaio. 2007: Proportional analysis of pig kidney arterial segments: Differences from the human kidney. J Endourology: 21(7) 784-788.
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0318

Sora M-C and Cook P. 2007: Epoxy Plastination of Biological Tissue: E12 technique J Int Soc Plastination 22:31-39.
https://doi.org/10.56507/FCTY3173

Steinke H, Thomas M. 2002: Plastination: Correlation of anatomical specimens and MRI. Klinische Sportmedizin/Clinical Sports Medicine-Germany (KCS) 3(3):41-46.

Tiedemann K; Ivic-Matijas D, 1988: Dehydration of macroscopic specimens by freeze substitution in acetone. J Int Soc Plastination, (2): 2-12.
https://doi.org/10.56507/SCLL2742

von Hagens G. 1986: Heidelberg Plastination Folder: Collection of all technical leaflets for plastination. Anatomische Institut 1, Heidelberg, Germany.

von Hagens G; Tiedeman K; Kriz W. 1987: The current potential of plastination. Anat Embryol 175(4): 411- 421.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309677

Weber W, Henry RW. 1993: Sheet plastination of body slices - E12 technique, filling method. J Int Soc Plastination 7(1): 16-22.
https://doi.org/10.56507/EZGX2343

Weber W, Weiglein A, Latorre R, Henry RW. 2007: Polyester Plastination of Biological Tissue: P35 Technique. J Int Soc Plastination 22:50-58.
https://doi.org/10.56507/MFED4472

Weiglein AH; Henry RW. 1993: Curing (hardening, polymerization) of the polymer-Biodur S10. J Int Soc Plastination 7(1):32-35.
https://doi.org/10.56507/ABNZ7085

Weiglein AH. 1997: Plastination. A tool for teaching
https://doi.org/10.1159/isbn.978-3-8055-8714-3

Online ISSN: 2311-777X
Contact Us
Copyright 2022
bookmarkcrosslist